Last June, Hasbro canceled its’ Hub/Discovery Family Littlest Pet Shop animated series after 4 seasons, due to low toy sales. At the time, Hasbro stated that they may be rebooting the franchise some time in the future.
Apparently, the future is now.
Yes.
In the intervening time since LPS 2012’s cancellation, Hasbro has since acquired Boulder Media, an Irish animation studio formerly owned by Cartoon Network. The new Littlest Pet Shop series is slated to arrive in the form of YouTube shorts which will start airing in fall 2017, with the full-blown series making its’ debut in 2018.
According to sources, the plot will revolve around “a world made by pets for pets where a portal opens up and the pets can go do things”.
Hmm, that sounds kind of familiar…

Just wish I could place it.
Character-wise, the series will focus on a sextet of main characters, referred to in the press as The Pet Six.
Yeah, let’s stop that before it starts.
- Roxie McTerrier (Brown Dog)
- Jade Catkin (Black Cat)
- Quincy Goatee (Yellow Goat)
- Trip Hamston (Hamsta) (Red Hamster)
- Bev Gilturtle (Blue Turtle with Purple shell)
- Edie von Keet (Yellow-Green Parakeet)
Names with no pets attached (listed as recurring characters)
- Mister Yut
- Savannah Cheetaby
- Wlsteria Perslla
OK, early impressions. So much to unpack here. Congrats, Hasbro. One of the main things that dogged the 2012 Littlest Pet Shop series was how it was unable to escape the shadow of its’ big sister series, My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, so what do you do with the new series? Make it even more like MLP: Friendship is Magic!
Of course, it may turn out to be something different and unique, but on paper this “world made for pets by pets” thing basically sounds like Equestria with other species.
Also, I can’t be the only one who finds it weird that this is a Littlest Pet Shop series and there’s no actual shop? I mean, it’s in the title, fer cryin’ out loud. Plus, I’m assuming that since these pets go into this portal to have their adventures, their owners are perpetually off-camera. That’s unfortunate, I think; they seem to be doing the very thing I hoped they wouldn’t do: exclude the human element from the show. I think that should’ve been kept, since the presence of humans was one thing that helped distinguish LPS from its’ big sister MLP.

Plus, I admit, I’m gonna miss Blythe.
Which brings me to my final observation: I get that this is a reboot and Hasbro wanted to start fresh with a clean slate, and it’s likely I just haven’t completely exorcised the ghosts of series past, but I’m sorry that the producers didn’t bring back any of the previous show’s characters. No Sunil, Zoe, Vinnie, Pepper, Russel, Minka, Sugar Sprinkles or Buttercream is going to take some getting used to, as they were all decent characters.

They could have at least brought back Penny Ling. I loved Penny Ling.
Now since this new show is being produced by a different studio, it’s possible that they couldn’t use any of the 2012 characters, but my big concern is that this new show idea smacks too much of MLP: FiM. I think Hasbro was a little too quick to turn its’ collective back on the 2012 show. The Blythe Baxter LPS wasn’t perfect, it had problems, but I didn’t think it was beyond repair. That concept just needed to be tweaked a little, not completely overhauled.
Here’s what I/we would’ve done (Jason already covered some of this in his LPS Final Season Retrospective, so I’ll to keep it brief):
- I would’ve done away with the 22-minute episode format. This show didn’t need to do single 20-minute stories just because MLP did it that way, plus many of the LPS plots seemed padded out anyway. I would have gone with 2 or 3 shorts per show.
- Kept the show in “our world”, albeit an exaggerated cartoon version thereof. The ‘real world’ setting was another that helped distinguish LPS from MLP.
- Kept the shop, kept Blythe and some of the human characters, only I would’ve broken the communication barrier and have the show go full-on Looney Tunes or Bloom County and have the animals be able to directly communicate with the humans and vice-versa. Yeah, that would render the whole “Blythe is special because she can talk to animals” premise null and void, but to be honest I was never a huge fan of that shtick in the first place.
- Give Blythe (or a new main human character who distinctly resembled her) 2 parents from the get-go, both of whom would still be alive and happily married. I personally hate the Dead/Missing Mother trope with the fury of 1000 suns.
- GET RID OF THOSE #@$%^&*! BISKIT TWINS. I’m not gonna mince words here, they were hands-down one of the things I hated most about the 2012 show. While I’m usually a fan of twin characters and rich characters, I found those 2 unbearable and their characters made no flipping sense. They had no reason whatsoever to antagonize Blythe other than they were the designated bad guys of the show and so they had to bad guy stuff, and since they not only outnumbered Blythe but were also far better off materially than her, they always just came off like bullies picking on her, and I hated how the writers always had Blythe simper and try to make nice with and sometimes even try to kowtow and suck up to those little creepos only for them to routinely piss on her head. I would’ve done one of 2 things with the Biskits: either change them to latter-day Bulk & Skull-esque characters, good-natured goofs as opposed to flat-out baddies, or merge the Biskits and the Baxters into one family unit, say have a benevolent rich family who owns the shop and the daughter of this family is a Blythe type character, or a pair of twin Blythe types, either 2 sisters or 1 sister and 1 brother (why not? I’m sure some boys buy LPS toys too–you do, some of you guys. Admit it).
Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this new show will be good. I have my reservations, but maybe I’ll be proven wrong. This series could rock, though I’m not thoroughly convinced yet.

We’ll just have to see.
Honestly, I’d rather if Blythe had her own series. I liked her more than the pets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That makes 2 of us, m8. She was apart of the reason I ended up liking this show more than MLP: FiM (And still do to this day.).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find it interesting how Hasbro seems to be going out of their way to ensure that the Littlest Pet Shop reboot is NOTHING like the 2012 series. Hasbro is acting like the previous series was a train wreck when it wan’t. LPS 2012 was canceled due to low toy sales. Ratings-wise, the show was doing OK. I can’t believe that Hasbro chose not to bring back any of the pets from the previous series. That’s too bad. I’m going to miss Sunil, Vinnie, Pepper and Sugar Sprinkles.
Sorry, Hasbro, but the background in that picture looks like it came straight outta Ponyville. If you’re trying to make this new LPS different from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, you need to try harder.
Also (and I realize that this is still very early), the article doesn’t mention where this new LPS series will be airing. My guess is that it will either once again run on Discovery Family or it will be a Netflix exclusive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
R.I.P. Zoey, Minka, Penny Ling, Russel, Pepper, Sunil, Vinnie, Blythe, and many others… They will be missed.
LikeLike
Wait a minute … “Pet Six”? XDD
LikeLike
Urgh, I know…it’s as if someone challenged Hasbro to pander to MLP: FiM even more. From the looks of things, they’re trying waaaaay too hard to replicate the success of MLP, right down to aping the basic formula and structure. Here’s hoping that changes when the new series makes its’ debut next year.
LikeLike
Yeah… I’m going into this new show with low expectations. All this pandering to the MLP crowd is rather embarrassing, especially since I was never an MLP fan to begin with, honestly. I just watched it because it was on – then I found better stuff to watch, like Dan Vs. and LPS (2012) on this channel, amongst other things.
LikeLike
Instead of coming up with new animals they should bring back the old ones. Another idea is to hook up with all the children already making LPS videos on Youtube and hook them up with some scholarships and endorsements. These children are very creative and funny!!!
LikeLike
in my opinion they should leave Littlest Pet Shop alone or add this concept as a segment to the original series since there’s littles Pet Street they could be mini Adventures added into along with the original episodes
LikeLike
Well, it’s a moot point since Hasbro canceled the 2012 Littlest Pet Shop series last year (Discovery Family has just been airing the reruns since then). Personally, I don’t object to the idea of a new LPS series, but I’m not feeling this particular concept. Of course, it’s worth noting that Hasbro has yet to release any footage of the new series, and we likely won’t see any of it until next year, so I choose to remain cautiously optimistic until I’ve at least seen some clips.
As a point of interest, LPS 2012 was actually the second LPS show. Kenner produced an earlier made for syndication LPS series that started and stopped in 1995.
LikeLike
https://mobile.twitter.com/Chevistian1/status/1097279947675181056
It seems like the show is cancelled.
LikeLike
To be fair, Hasbro hasn’t officially announced that LPS: A World of Our Own has been axed, they just haven’t greenlit a 2nd season yet. The future of Transformers Rescue Bots was in limbo for a long time before we got Rescue Bots Academy.
However, if this is truly the end, then that one Twitter user is correct: assuming it wasn’t low toy sales, DiscFam and Hasbro are largely to blame for LPS’ demise because they really didn’t promote the show (or its’ inevitable toy line) the way they should have.
LikeLike
Agreed on DiscFam’s lack of decent promotion for Littlest Pet Shop: A World of Our Own, but the fact that LPS had difficulty finding an audience even with the benefit of having MLP as a lead-in is saying something (and again, this is assuming that the show wasn’t canceled due to low toy sales).
LikeLike