Unpopular Opinions: The Incredibles 2

I feel like I’m the only person who’s not really looking forward to the announced sequel to Disney/Pixar’s The Incredibles.

disney-infinity-incredibles

Don’t get me wrong; it’s not because I didn’t enjoy the first movie, quite the opposite, I thought it was great, one of my favorites, if not my all-time favorite Pixar movie, but I was actually OK with The Incredibles being a one-and-done film. The story was told: Superheroes fell out of favor with the public, the Parrs settled down into domestic life, a crisis erupted, the Parrs faced adversity (and their own personal issues) and triumphed, the public became OK with Supers again, and the family was back in business. The end. What more needs to said? What questions did the first movie leave unanswered?

It’s usually at this point that some wag pipes in with:

mortimer-snerd

“Duh, they need to make a second movie since the first one ended on a cliff hanger. Ah-hyuk!”

if-my-calculations-are-correct-youre-an-idiot

Yeah, no. The ending of The Incredibles wasn’t a cliff hanger ending, it was a “We’re back in business” ending. Did you honestly think that Pixar was planning to devote an entire movie to The Underminer? Anyways, there was already a video game about that, Incredibles: Rise of the Underminer.

Which brings me to the other reason why I’m not exactly anticipating an Incredibles sequel: the reason the first one was so good was because it was about the superhero mythos as a whole; it wasn’t your typical “Bad guy makes trouble, good guys have to go out and stop him kind of deal”, it dealt with so much more: family, marriage, relationships, acceptance, hero worship, hubris, isolation. My big fear is the next movie will just end up being another generic superhero story, and reading some of the fanfics and story ideas that people have suggested for an Incredibles 2, most of which stink like day-old sushi, doesn’t make me any more optimistic. I really hope they don’t opt to make it a time-skip, ’cause I hate those.

However, Brad Bird has said that he wasn’t going to embark on an Incredibles sequel until he had a good enough story for one, and Pixar has managed to surprise us before (Finding Dory seems to be going over well with audiences, though it’s worth mentioning that I still haven’t seen Finding Nemo yet–yeah, I know; talking fish movies just generally aren’t my thing), so I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I’m trying to remain optimistic, though I still have reservations.

Unpopular Opinions: Quality VS Quantity

Over the years, there seems to be a trend towards “More is better”. hence, due largely to the success of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe), the recent wave of comic book/superhero movies such as Batman V Superman: Dawn of Sucking, X-Men: Overstuffed and Ninja Turtles 2: The Legend of Curly’s Gold, are now trying to cram as many characters as they can into a single movie and on TV shows the trend leans toward expanded worlds with a large number of cast members…

simpsons_cast_poster_giant_zps1qxav05y

Hey! Did you spot Waldo?

…So naturally, I have to go against the grain and state this Unpopular Opinion:

I prefer small casts to large ones. Always have, and probably always will.

Yeah, I get that a lot of people think huge casts are great; there’s a ton of different characters and plots to explore, it feels more like an actual world, blah blah blah, but I’m more of a minimalist (and let’s face it: I’m also lazy); having to keep track of so many characters and story lines is a chore to me, and when there’s too many, I just lose interest.

Case in point: I was probably the only person on the internet who wasn’t having a fangasm when Cartoon Network’s Justice League mutated into Justice League Unlimited.

jlu_zpspkwj44fz

The original JL format wasn’t perfect (I was never keen on the idea of Hawkgirl/Hawkwoman being on the team without Hawkman, not that she wasn’t a good or capable character, but in my mind she’s part of a duo and I can’t see her alone, and shipping Hawkgirl with someone other than her spouse and turning Hawkman into a Shayera Hol fanboy stalker didn’t sit right with me at all) but it was worlds better than the format change. I never liked the expansion of the League from the Super 7 to the JL Army; I didn’t like it then and I don’t like it now. For one, it just came off as gimmicky to me, like a ploy to sell more toys, especially since 2/3 of these new characters never actually did anything. Some people were fan-wanking:

static20shock20and20gear_zpsgwgvvsvy

“At the end of the Static Shock episode “A League of Their Own”, the heroes said that Static and Gear would be joining the Justice League one day, so why weren’t they on JLU? Where were they?”

To which I respond, if Gear and Static were actually going to be the focus of stories and you know, do stuff, then I’d be totally fine with them appearing on JLU; they’re both cool characters, but I don’t see the need to put them on the show just to occasionally see them hovering in the background every few episodes.

-FTR, we did get to see Static in the League in “Time, Warped”…

Static2070

…and we got a glimpse of Gear in the SS episode “Future Shock”…

Future_Gear

Too much time in front of a monitor, I see…

..So there’s that.

The other reason I didn’t like the JL Army was because it cheapened the whole product; made it look like any Joe Shmoe with a flashy costume and a gimmick could get into the League; not the best image to convey for what’s supposed to be the greatest force for good on the planet. A club’s not exclusive if just anybody can be a member. If the League was going to open their doors for total jobbers like Vibe, Gypsy, Shining Knight and Vigilante, then they might as well have gone the whole 9 yards and stuck Mr. T, Inspector Gadget, the Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling and the Super Globetrotters in there as well. The producers wanted to bring in some other DC characters to mix things up? Fine. Then just bring the occasional Super Guest like they used to do on the old Super Friends show and keep the Big 7 as an elite (and exclusive) group.

When it comes to fiction, I happen to follow the rule of KISS:

kiss_zpstal3gtvc

DETROIT ROCK CITY!!

That being Keep It Simple, Stupid. Give a hoot, don’t convolute . Don’t over-complicate things when it’s not necessary. Keep everything streamlined and only focus on the main characters and their stories. This results in a better quality end product, since the creator only has to concentrate on the characters that matter, rather than trying to squeeze in a ton of ancillary characters that you really don’t need and have no real reason to be there.

A good example of the latter is The Amazing World of Gumball.

Gumball_9512

 

Gumball‘s producers seem to want to take a Simpsons type approach to the show, focusing on the entire town/world as a whole and intent on giving every single character a spotlight episode, even the 1-note, 1-joke characters who simply aren’t interesting or capable enough to sustain an entire plot…

Gumball11

…Whereas my brother Jason feels that the show should focus solely (if not exclusively) on the Watterson family first and foremost, and I have to say, based on what I’ve seen of Gumball, I have to agree with him. (Big surprise, I know.)

It’s like the game Sonic Heroes. Why cram your game full of a bunch of ham ‘n’ eggers that most people aside from super-hardcore fans really don’t care about…

sonicheroes2-1_zpsrx8parbj

..When you could just as easily make a kick-ass game that only stars the biggest, most dimensional and most layered characters that people actually want to play as?

sonicheroeswallpaper1024_zps3hu4dvwv

Again, think KISS: Keep It Simple, Sir. Let’s not confuse quantity with quality. More doesn’t automatically equal better, or even as good. Some of the best comedians used restricted tools, and some of the greatest works of all time have done so by keeping things small: The Honeymooners and All in the Family each had only 4 protagonists, Sanford & Son and Two’s Company only had 2. Red Dwarf, one of THE best shows of all time, has never had more 3 or 4 regular cast members (5 counting Holly). The best Looney Tunes shorts have always centered on only 2 or 3 characters at a time, like Bugs and Elmer or Bugs and Sam or Bugs and Marvin or Bugs and Taz or Bugs and Daffy or Bugs, Daffy and Elmer or Daffy and Porky or Daffy and Marvin or Porky and Sylvester. I’ve always preferred smaller casts and fewer main characters. If the characters you have are cool and interesting, you don’t need a ton of characters.

I’d rather have a small set of elites and mega-stars…

garfield_with_odie

Trinity3

..Than a squad of D-Listers…

Justice-League-movie-970x545

…Any day.

Unpopular Opinions: Spritle & Chim-Chim

Contrary to popular opinion, I don’t hate the characters of Spritle and Chim-Chim from Speed Racer. In fact, I find them weirdly fascinating in a odd, stupid way.

Spritle & Chim-Chim

BTW, did you know that Spritle’s name is a variation on the word ‘sprite’, referring to how he’s small? Now you do.

I know these 2 have received their fair share of vitriol from cartoon fans and stand-up comedians, but not me. It could be because I’ve always been a fan of silly, zany humor and I’ve always preferred the comedic jokey-joke characters to the straight, sensible, serious stoic hero types, or maybe it’s just ’cause I’m an odd bird, but I personally have never had any serious problem with them.

spritle_chimchim_trunk

Yeah, their antics are stupid and annoying, but they’re the annoying little brother and his equally annoying pet chimp, the add-on comic relief characters of the show; they’re supposed to be stupid and annoying.

S&CC2

Spritle and Chim-Chim’s humor is loud, stupid, pointless, juvenile and pretty dumb, but none of these assessments are criticisms as much as they are simple statements of fact. Can any of those epithets really be criticisms when it seems like they’re exactly what the show was aiming for? To point out that Spritle and Chim-Chim were silly, infantile and annoying is like pointing out that cotton candy has sugar in it.

S&CC3

To elaborate on a point made by Jason in his Cartoon Couch on The Funny Company, another reason why I don’t hate these 2 is because they represent a trope which I’ve always enjoyed: when characters on shows are totally accepting of their weirdness surrounding them. My favorite animated shows are the ones which gladly embrace the big, dopey silliness of cartoons and just run with it. The Mifune/Racer family just happens to have a live-in chimpanzee, who regularly dresses exactly like their youngest child, and often seems to be his twin. Sure, why wouldn’t they? And nobody on the show ever questions it. There’s just a surreal nuttiness to their whole existence that I find intriguing. It makes no sense, but for me that’s part of the appeal.

Aya Mom Racer

Plus, if the presence of Spritle and Chim-Chim means more scenes at home with Aya/Mom Racer, then I’m definitely down. Pour me a glass of MILF!

So no, I don’t dislike Spritle and Chim-Chim the way so many others do. I concede that they’re dumb and grating, but again, I think that’s what the producers were going for. In the right hands, characters like them could and can be made appealing, though admittedly they’re best taken in small doses. If put in the front, they’d have to stick to shorts, as their shtick doesn’t really lend itself to longer stories.

-Think that’s weird? I’ve talked to people who actually don’t hate Scrappy-Doo.

scrappy-doo

“Lemme at ’em! Lemme at ’em! Wait, WHAAA?”

Believe it or not!

Unpopular Opinions: Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker

Here’s an unpopular opinion for ya: I liked Andrew Garfield’s portrayal of Peter Parker.

Andrew Garfield Spider-Man

No, I’m not kidding. I know a lot of Spider fans were crying blasphemy over The Amazing Spider-Man‘s Peter Parker being re-imagined as a wise-cracking Sk8ter Boy, but I actually didn’t mind this take on the character. Whether Garfield’s characterization was a good fit for Peter Parker/Spider-Man is debatable, but I did like how for once the science-loving whiz kid character wasn’t portrayed as a stereotypical dweeby loser. I found it a refreshing change of pace to see a smart kid who didn’t have a bowl-shaped haircut, thick glasses, a collared shirt buttoned all the way to the top, a pocket protector and high-water pants.

revenge-nerds

“Easy as Pi! EHHH-huh-huh-huh!”

I plan to one day make a show featuring a super-smart genius kid who isn’t a stereotyped nerd or bookworm. I personally think we need to see more ‘cool’ smart kids. Just because someone’s prolific in math and science doesn’t automatically make that person physically awkward and socially retarded. Mathletes and Science Geeks can be outgoing, savvy and attractive too. To quote ESPN’s Bomani Jones: “Just because your kids are into science doesn’t mean you have to dress them like dorks. Smart kids like cool sneakers too!”

Unpopular Opinions: The Smurflings

Welcome to a new segment on Twinsanity called Unpopular Opinions, where we mention an opinion of ours about cartoons and pop culture that goes against the grain and post our rambling thoughts about them. One shouldn’t be shocked if the things we state here are not commonly thought of beliefs, because we’ve stated their unpopularity at the top of the page!

I’ll get the ball rolling, as it were, by stating an unpopular opinion of mine:

I don’t hate the Smurflings.

Smurflings_Playing

It’s shocking, but true. Now don’t get me wrong. I’m not in love with them either, as I’ve never been a Smurfs groupie to begin with, but I don’t hate these characters the way that many fans of the TV show do. The reason why could be because I stopped watching the Hanna Barbera Saturday morning cartoon regularly shortly before the Smurflings’ arrival, and so I’ve only caught a handful of episodes that the Smurflings appeared in. Heck, I didn’t even know what the characters’ back story was or even realize that these characters had a backstory until reading about on Wikipedia.

Some fans will cite the introduction of The Smurflings as being the precise moment when The Smurfs jumped the shark, despite the fact that Baby Smurf (a much more useless character, in my opinion) made his debut an entire year before the arrival of the Smurflings. At least the Smurflings could talk, had personalities and could do things. Some fans see them as this shows’ equivalents to Scrappy Doo, but I wouldn’t go that far.

I kind of like Snappy because he reminds of me a bit of Mrs. Fribsy’s son Martin from The Secret of NIHM (who’s one of my favorite fictional boy characters, incidentally). Plus, I like his T-shirt with the storm cloud decal. Sassette seems like a potentially interesting character with some spunk to her that I find appealing (i’m not feeling the whole token girl thing these days, but there we are), and as for Natural (“Nat”) Smurf, I think that getting de-aged was probably the best thing that could have happened to his character. Yeah, he originally loved nature and had a rapport with animals, but he looked like any generic Smurf, and I can’t completely dislike a character who dresses like Huckleberry Finn, bare feet and all. I’m weird like that. Of the four, I’d say that Slouchy is probably the least interesting Smurfling, mainly because he’s the hardest personality to pin down. A lot of the time in the episode that I saw (and there weren’t many of them), he just seemed to be kind of, there. It’s almost as though he was added mainly to fill up the numbers so there’d be 4 Smurflings. Frankly, if the shows’ producers really wanted 4 characters, why not have 2 boys and 2 girls? That would have been more balanced.

Another reason why I don’t hate the Smurflings is because they remind me of an idea that Damon and I have kicked around a few times over the years; the idea of having a juvenile comedy team a la the Marx Brothers or The Banana Splits, so I can’t hate any characters who have given me the incentive to do something creative.

As for the latter additions to The Smurfs, such as Grandpa Smurf, Nanny Smurf, Wild Smurf, Scruple and the like, I have no opinion on them because I haven’t seen any of the episodes where those characters appeared. By that time, I was all Smurfed out and I wasn’t even watching the show sporadically anymore. I think that Lisa Simpson said it best when she said:

Lisa Simpson

“Most TV shows add new characters when they’re running out of ideas.”